Showing posts with label E.L. Doctorow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E.L. Doctorow. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

E. L. Doctorow, Sweetland Stories


E. L. Doctorow, author of Ragtime (1975), Loon Lake (1980), and Billy Bathgate (1989), has died at the age of 84. Although he is much better known as a novelist, he did publish a number of short stories, his best collection, in my opinion being Sweetland Stories in 2004
 Acknowledging that the novel has always been his typical rhythm, Doctorow, in an interview after the publication of this collection of stories, said that while editing Best American Stories: 2000, he discovered that many authors were not writing the tight epiphanic Chekhovian story, but rather were going back to the more leisurely plot-based story typical of the nineteenth century. The result of this realization are these five long stories, most of which originally appeared in The New Yorker.
I have discussed one of the stories in this collection, "Jolene," along with the film version of that story, in an earlier blog.  I offer the following comments on other stories in Sweetland Stories in Doctorow's honor.
The stories are primarily plot-based, recounted in a seemingly artless, casual tone--three told in first-person by deluded male narrators and two narrated in third person by ironic storytellers.  What is arguably “sweet” about these stories is the naiveté and innocence, thus ultimately the self-delusion, of the central characters as they seek to achieve the American dream, find transcendence in a savior, or uphold their ideals in the face of political chicanery.
“A House on the Plains” is a comic/horror, con artist story, told by the slow-witted son of a “merry widow” mother. After the father, who the mother says was pretty smart, “for a man,” mysteriously dies, the widow thinks it best that she and her son leave Chicago for a small town in Illinois where no one will jump to conclusions.  Once settled, she takes in three orphans from a New York social organization and ominously declares soon after that if they don’t come up with some money before winter the only resources they will have is the insurance she took out on the three children.
The mother, a bigger-than-life, pragmatic believer in the American Dream, advertises for immigrant men, particular Swedes and Norwegians, to join her in a partnership in a bountiful farm in the Midwest.  However, one by one the men who visit her disappear as her bank account increases from their insurance policies.  When the brother of one of the missing men arrives and begins to ask uncomfortable questions, the mother, nonplussed, formulates an escape plan that, despite its appalling results, is treated as blithely as the rest of the horrors in this comic tall tale.  Quite simply, she cuts off the heads of the nosey brother and her housekeeper to make it look as she and her son have died in a fire and   frames her handyman for the arson.
The story ends with the handyman in jail, Mama in California, and the narrator son reunited with his sexual partner from Chicago. The fact that three orphans, several innocent men, and the housekeeper are all dead is, of course, just part of the comic tone of this tall tale that makes us admire Mama for her achieving the American Dream of financial independence.
Doctorow has said that “Baby Wilson,” chosen for Best American Short Stories 2003, was inspired by his seeing a young woman in a long paisley dress walking along the Coast Highway in Southern California.  Although Doctorow says he is not sure why he made her into Karen Robileaux, the kidnapper of a newborn baby, he thinks he must have decided as a premise for the story that while a man would kidnap a child for ransom, a woman would want the child for herself. 
The story is told by Lester Romanowski, Karen’s shiftless boyfriend.  When she brings the stolen baby home, she declares it is her own newborn child that she is giving to Lester to be his son.  Lester decides he is going to reform himself into a person who makes executive decisions.  He wins some money at gambling, procures six fake credit cards and goes to sleep thinking what a “great country this was.”
 In a family van he buys with an American Express Gold Card, Lester and his “imitation wife and child” head west, of course, to California.  With the sun lighting their way like a “gold road,” he has a revelation of a new life for himself, where he will become a dependable father with a full-time job.  However, his dreams are dashed when he hears on the radio that the family of the kidnapped child has received a ransom note. Can you believe the evil in this world? he asks Karen, who articulates the theme of the story by saying that she has faith that people can be redeemed. 
 Lester and Karen drop the baby off at a church and head to Alaska, another place where people live and let live, a place where nobody asks too many questions.  When Karen gets pregnant, Lester declares himself alert and “ready for inspiration.”
“Walter John Harmon” is also a story about self-delusion.  The narrator, a former lawyer who has joined a religious group lead by an uneducated garage mechanic named Walter John Harmon, insists that he and his wife are not cult victims, and allows his wife to take part in a “purification” sex ceremony with the cult leader. 
The Community survives because many of the followers are lawyers, accountants, public relations experts, and computer specialists, who know how to keep the outside world at a distance.  The story focuses on the means by which Harmon maintains his charismatic hold on the Community and how the members protect themselves from the outside world.
The followers’ need to believe is so strong that even when Walter John deserts them with the narrator’s wife, the Elders, using the vague language and zany logic of philosophic sophistry and Messianic Christianity, argue that this immersion in sin and disgrace is a beautiful paradox of a prophecy fulfilling itself by means of its negation.  The narrator basks in the glory of his unfaithful wife who has been chosen to join Harmon.
Discovering half-burned papers in which Harmon has laid out plans for a wall to be built around the compound, a task the Community finds difficult since all their estates have been placed in Harmon’s name in Swiss bank accounts, the destitute group undergoes a harsh winter.  The story ends ominously with the narrator planning to build the wall, noting that the plans, in spite of Harmon’s lack of military experience, provide the Community with a clear and unimpeded field of fire.
“Child, Dead in the Rose Garden” follows the conventions of a political mystery.  Told by a White House Special Agent, B. W. Molloy, the story recounts the implications and effects of the discovery of a dead five-year-old boy in the Rose Garden of the White House.  Only five months from retirement, Molloy, a twenty-four year veteran of the FBI, gets the case.  Suspecting a symbolic act by terrorists, the administration wants the investigation to be kept secret, and Molloy finds himself running into obstructions from the head of the White House Office of Domestic Policy, who insists that the body was never found, that the event never happened.   Molloy, however, perseveres and flies to the boy’s home in Houston, only to find out that the child’s immigrant parents are being detained by the INS.  Further investigation reveals that the boy’s father was a gardener for a wealthy Texan, been a strong supporter of the President. 
The source of the mystery turns out to be the man’s daughter, Chrissie Stevens, who engineered the placement of the boy, who died of natural causes, to shock those that run things into some sense of responsibility.  After warning the Office of Domestic Policy at the White House that if the boy’s parents are not released by the INS, he will give the story to major newspapers, Molloy resigns from the Bureau and writes a letter to the Guzmans telling them that their son will lie in an unmarked grave in Arlington National Cemetery among others who died for their country.
These are entertaining and diverting stories that explore the nature of individual human hopes and the national mythos of the American Dream told by a master storyteller.


Friday, June 3, 2011

Importance of Tone in Doctorow's "Jolene: A Life" Compared to Dan Ireland's Film Jolene

Just after the turn of the century, the American critic H. S. Canby called attention to the fact that the art of modern short fiction was as much that of tone as incident, noting that the work of the author in the story is "harmonized into one tone, as if narrative were a painting.” Many years later, well-known modern critic Irving Howe argued:

If the short-story writer is to create the illusion of reality, he must sing mostly aria and very little recitative. As a result, he uses a series of technical devices, often quite simple inflections of style, the end effect of which we call the story tone. A novel written in one dominant tone becomes intolerable; a story too often deviating from it risks chaos.

The relationship between E. L. Doctorow’s story “Jolene: A Life” and Dan Ireland’s film Jolene provides an illustrative example of the importance of tone to the short story, indicating that even in a highly plotted, episodic story, tone is more important than plot.

The Film Jolene, (2008) directed by Dan Ireland, from a screenplay by Dennis Yares, is based on the story "Jolene: A Life" by E.L. Doctorow from his collection, Sweet Land Stories. Ireland is perhaps best known for having directed the film The Whole Wide World, which introduced Renee Zellweger.

The film introduces Jessica Chastain as Jolene, and features the following well-known supporting actors: Frances Fisher (Cindy), Rupert Friend (Coco Lerger), Dermot Mulroney (Uncle Phil), Zeb Bewnab (Mickey), Theresa Russell (Aunt Kay), Denise Richards (Marin Lerger), Michael Vartan (Brad Benton) and Chazz Palminteri (Sal Fontaine).

The film runs two hours, but the screenwriter and director do not really have to invent a back-story filled with new characters or episodes, for the story itself is so episodic that it actually takes two film hours to tell the story of Jolene, who begins as a teenager in a foster home and ends up in her mid-twenties in Hollywood, but with her dreams intact.

As a brief aside: I just finished reading Kenneth Slawenski’s recent biography of J. D. Salinger, in which we are reminded that once upon a time Salinger sold the film rights for this great story “Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut.” The result—a typical Hollywood romantic tear-jerker remembered for only two things: the title theme song, “My Foolish Heart,” and the fact that it convinced Salinger never, never, never to sell the film rights to another of his works, no matter how much Hollywood begged for the rights to Catcher in the Rye. Basing a film on a short story often requires the invention of an elaborate plotted back-story for the story’s single scene, something Salinger perhaps did not anticipate. A more successful example, in which the back-story actually works, is the film version of Hemingway’s “The Killers,” which starred Burt Lancaster as the doomed boxer.

A notorious recent example is the new Will Farrell movie, “Everything Must Go,” which the credits list as being based on a story by Raymond Carver. No such thing! If you have never read Carver’s wonderful little story “Why Don’t You Dance?” and if you are a diehard Farrell fan, you may like this movie. But I suspect that only reason it is credited to Carver is because the producers thought it might “sell” the film. It’s too damned bad.

E. L. Doctorow, author of Ragtime (1975), Loon Lake (1980), and Billy Bathgate (1989), is much better known as a novelist than a short-story writer. Acknowledging that the novel has always been his typical rhythm, Doctorow, in an interview after the publication of this collection of stories, said that while editing Best American Stories: 2000, he discovered that many authors were not writing the tight epiphanic Chekhovian story, but rather were going back to the more leisurely plot-based story typical of the nineteenth century. The result of this realization are these five long stories, most of which originally appeared in The New Yorker.

The stories in Sweet Land Stories are primarily plot-based, recounted in a seemingly artless, casual tone--three told in first-person by deluded male narrators and two narrated in third person by ironic storytellers. What is arguably “sweet” about these stories is the naiveté and innocence, thus ultimately the self-delusion, of the central characters as they seek to achieve the American dream, find transcendence in a savior, or uphold their ideals in the face of political chicanery.

The heroine of “Jolene: A Life” has her dreams, even though she starts out with several strikes against her. She marries Mickey Holler when she is fifteen to get out of a foster home where the father molests her and the mother beats her. But it is a move from the frying pan into the fire, for Mickey and Jolene have to live with his Uncle Phil and Aunt Kay, and Uncle Phil has an eye for Jolene. In comic fashion typical of these stories, Uncle Phil finally has his way with Jolene by coming up behind her one day while she is scrubbing the floor, picking her up with the scrub brush still in her hand, and carrying her into his bed. When Mickey finds out, he beats up Uncle Phil in a slapstick battle and then jumps off a bridge and kills himself.

Jolene is put into a juvenile loony bin, but in a silly bit of good fortune, a woman in the place smashes a mirror and cuts her wrists with a sliver. When all the mirrors are removed and nobody can see herself, Jolene begins a business of drawing portraits of the girls so they would know what they look like. She then makes friends with an admiring female attendants, but when the woman gets Jolene out, Jolene promptly leaves her and hits the road, finally ending up, at age seventeen, in Phoenix, Arizona.

Like other protagonists of the American Dream stories in Sweet Land Stories, Jolene appreciates the fact that in the West nobody cares much what you do. She meets a tattoo artist named Coco Leger, moves in with him, and starts working at his Institute of Body Art, that is, until one day, Coco’s first wife shows up with a baby on her hip. Jolene finds Coco’s cocaine, calls the cops and tells them about it, and then takes off after getting fifteen dollars for her wedding band.

Arriving in Las Vegas, Jolene, still young and shapely, gets a job dancing topless, and meets Sal, a distinguished gray-haired man, who puts a diamond choker on her neck and asks her to move in with him. When Sal is killed by mobsters, Jolene takes off again, this time to Tulsa, Oklahoma, where she meets and marries Brad G. Benton and becomes a young matron of the upper class. After she has a baby and Brad starts to beat her, she gets a divorce, but Brad and his family get custody of the child. Finally, Jolene takes off for Hollywood, the land of dreams and opportunity. The story ends in Doctorow’s usual comic pathos, with Jolene thinking that maybe she will act in movies, so that one day she can go back to Tulsa in a Rolls-Royce and her son will answer the door to meet his movie-star mother.

The stories in Sweet Land Stories are entertaining and diverting tales told by a master storyteller. However, in their simplistic, self-indulgent shots at innocence, ignorance, and naiveté, they fail to provide any important insights into either the nature of individual human hopes or the national mythos about the American Dream.

What interests me most about the story/film relationship of “Jolene” is how much the story depends on tone and how much the film depends on character. Because of its wry tone, the story is actually quite comic, in spite of the many tragic travails of the heroine. However, the film, because it is deprived of the storyteller’s tone, is sweetly sad, although the character of Jolene, played irresistibly by new actress Jessica Chastain, manages to endear herself to the viewer in spite of her many mistakes about men. Not a great story. Not a great film. But interesting, nonetheless, for what they suggest about the importance of tone to the short story as a form.