Well, it is Independence Day in America and I am celebrating
with my family by braving the barbecue grill—complete with corn on the cob,
baked beans, roasted spuds, and piled-high hamburgers. That will mean extra time on the Wii
exercise board tomorrow. I prepared for
the day, ironically, by watching the first episodes of two PBS series last
night on the telly—“Queen and Country” and “Michael Woods’ History of England.”
I will sit in my yard tonight and watch my neighbors set off illegal fireworks
in the cul-de-sac to celebrate the fact that America is the country that put
the “post” in postcolonial. Ah, land of
the Free!
Meanwhile, in the lovely city of Cork, on the west coast of
Ireland—our postcolonial partner--the winner of the Frank O’Connor Award for
the Short Story will be announced. I
would love to be there. The last time I
was in Cork—four years ago—I was so sick I thought I would die and thus spent
more time in bed coughing than at the pubs drinking, as any good visitor to
Ireland should.
I have no idea what instructions the judges for the Frank
O’Connor Short Story Award are given.
All I know is what the O’Connor website states—that the aim of the
yearly prize is to “reward an individual author’s commitment to this most
exacting of forms and encourage the publication of collections of stories in
book form as distinct from single stories in periodicals.”
Self-styled the world’s greatest cheerleader for the short
story, I think that is a most admirable aim.
But if this is meant to be guidance for the judges, then does it not
seem somewhat ambiguous? Are the judges
really to choose one book out of six that most reflects an author’s commitment
to the short story? Or are they
instructed to choose the book they think is the “best” of the six shortlisted
stories?
If the former, does that mean that Etgar Keret, the author
(according to his promotional material) of six best-selling short story
collections, has made a stronger commitment to the form than Sarah Hall or
Lucia Perillo, for whom this is their debut collection? If the former, is the “best” collection of
the six the one that best reflects the “exacting” nature of the short story?
Since the winner receives 25,000
Euros, which is roughly equivalent to 31, 570 American dollars (“the single
biggest prize for a short story collection in the world”) and since one of the
stipulations of the prize is that the publisher of the winning book put a
“Winner of the Frank O’Connor Short Story Award Prize” sticker on the cover,
thus insuring increased sales of the book, these are not trivial questions.
I have done my best to discuss the
six books honestly—laying bare my personal biases and underlining my critical
criteria. If you have read my essays on
the six shortlisted collections, you may be able to determine which one I would
choose—were I a judge. But since I am
not a judge, it little matters which one I think shows the strongest commitment
to the short story or reflects the generic characteristics of exactness.
If I were to group the six collections in order of my
admiration and pleasure, I would rank Dark Lies the Island, The
Beautiful Indifference, and Suddenly a Knock on the Door in the top
half. I would, sorry to say, put Happiness
is a Chemical in the Brain, What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank, and
The Trouble with Fire in the bottom half.
If I were a judge, which one of the top three would I choose
as winner of the Frank O’Connor Award?
It would depend on the criteria the contest sponsors had stipulated and
the other judges and I agreed upon, for it seems to me that you cannot engage
in the joint judging of a work of art unless everyone is applying the same
criteria. If I were asked to pick the
collection I like best, it would be Dark Lies the Island. If I were asked to choose the one that shows
the strongest commitment to the short story, it would be Suddenly a Knock on
the Door. But if I were to choose
the collection that, in my humble opinion, best reflects the poetic exactness and
complexity of the genre, it would have to be The Beautiful Indifference.
I hope all the attendees at the Cork Conference have a grand
time celebrating the short story, and I extend my best wishes to the six
shortlisted nominees for the prize.
As ever, I'm fully in accord with you Mr May.
ReplyDeleteSo why did the judges choose from our bottom tranche?