Dorothy
Johnston, on whose new book Eight Pieces
on Prostitution I have posted a recent blog, has contributed an interesting
comment on Tim Horvath’s new collection
Afterstories, about which I have also posted a recent blog. Dorothy says my
reference to Poe and realism in the post has reminded her of her recent reading
of T. S. Eliot’s essay, “The Music of Poetry,” suggesting that some of the
things Eliot says about poetry seem “germane to the discussion about the
dimensions of the short story form, those aspects which escape categorisation
by such terms as 'plot' or 'realism'. Eliot talks about the poet being
'occupied with frontiers of consciousness beyond which words fail, though
meanings still exist'. Although I will always be a prose writer and never a
poet,” Dorothy says,”this seems apt to me”
I agree with Dorothy and revisited Eliot’s essay on
the music of poetry to see what relation his ideas have toward the way short
stories mean. Perhaps echoing Keats’s “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,” Eliot
says: “the music of poetry is not something which exists apart from the
meaning. Otherwise, we could have poetry
of great musical beauty which made no sense, and I have never come across such
poetry.”
Several prose
writers have praised the musical beauty of the short story as well. Indeed, one
of the most common judgments authors have made about the short story over the
years is that it is next to the poem in artistic challenge and excellence. Poe was the first to say so, proclaiming:
“The tale proper, in our opinion, affords unquestionably the fairest field for
the exercise of the loftiest talent, which can be afforded by the wide domains
of mere prose.”
After Poe, perhaps the most oft quoted poem/short
story comparison is William Faulkner’s flat-out assertion, "A short story
is the nearest thing I know to lyric poetry,” or Herbert Gold’s insistence that
the short story must “strike hot like the lyric poem.” The most common characteristic the short
story shares with the lyric poem, Gold argues, is that they both tend to
“control and formalize experience.”
However, this very characteristic, according to British writer James
Lasdun, is one of the reasons many readers don’t care for the short story.
Lasdun suggests that short stories do not sell well because the genre demands
an interest in form more than the novel does, and “people do not seem so
interested in form these days.”
Echoing Poe’s emphasis on the formal unity of the literary art work, Eliot sys the music of
verse is ” not a line by line matter, but a question of the whole poem.” The
work of art, argues Eliot, depends on its overall structure or form. He says, for example, “A play of Shakespeare
is a very complex musical structure…”
Eliot believes that a poet may gain much from the
study of music. ”I believe that the properties in which music concerns the poet
most nearly, are the sense of rhythm and the sense of structure…. A poem, or a
passage of a poem, may tend to realize itself first as a particular rhythm
before it reaches expression in words, and that this rhythm may bring to birth
the idea and the image…:
Prose writers have said much the same about the
short story. For example, Harold Brodkey
says, “The music of language carries more of the real meaning [in the short
story] than the literal meaning of words does. A shift in the mind, in the
mood, and you lose control of that music.” American author Charles D’Ambrosio
agrees, chiming in that, “It’s the musical nature of sentences, where you
actually hear the sound in a meaningful way, and those sounds have meaning and
nuances as important as any of the content.” “I love that aspect of the short
story, says D’Ambrosio; it’s almost like reading a poem.” Short story writer
Amy Hempel says that when she starts a story, she often knows the beat, the
rhythm of the first line or first paragraph, without knowing what the words
are. “I’ll be doing the equivalent of humming a tune over and over again,” she
says, “and then this tune will be translated into a sentence. I trust that.
There’s something visceral about the musical quality of a sentence.”
Hempel’s fellow short story writer, Deborah
Eisenberg concurs, noting that in her stories, “Sometimes there’s a kind of
tonality that I want, almost as if I were writing a piece of music.” And short story master David Means says about
his experience writing the short story: “You listen to a song and get a bit of
narrative along with beat and tone and sound and images, then the song fades
out, or hits that final beat, and you’re left with something that’s tangible
and also deeply mysterious.” This deeply mysterious, yet tangible
something—what Donald Barthelme calls “rigorous truth”—is related to the formal
nature of the short story, which communicates by pattern rather than by explanation or by mimesis.
Perhaps the most provocative and most difficult to
prove statement Eliot makes about poetry is similar to statements made about
the most challenging short stories by such writers as Chekhov, Hemingway,
Malamud, Carver, Trevor, and Alice Munro: “If, as we are aware, only a part of
the meaning can be conveyed by paraphrase, that is because the poet is occupied
with frontiers of consciousness beyond which words fail, though meanings still
exist.” Eliot adds, “There may be much more in a poem than the author was aware
of.”
That greatest of all short-story writers, Alice Munro,
has said, “When I write a story I want to make a certain kind of structure, and
I know the feeling I want to get from being inside that structure.” Munro used the term “feeling” again when an
interviewer asked her if the meaning of a story is more important to her than
the event. “What happens as event doesn’t really much matter,” Munro replied.
“When the event becomes the thing that matters, the story isn’t working too
well. There has to be a feeling in the story.” Rather than being concerned with
character or cause-and-effect consequence, Munro says she wants the “characters
and what happens subordinated to a climate,” by which, she says, she means something
like “mood.” When Munro was asked about intent in her stories, she said, “What
I like is not to really know what the story is all about. And for me to keep
trying to find out.” What makes a story interesting, she says, is the “thing
that I don’t know and that I will discover as I go along.”
Eliot’s
suggestion about frontiers of consciousness beyond which words fail echo Eudora
Welty’s claim, "The first thing we see about a story is its mystery. And
in the best stories, we return at the last to see mystery again. Every good
story has mystery--not the puzzle kind, but the mystery of allurement. As we
understand the story better, it is likely that the mystery does not necessarily
decrease; rather it simply grows more beautiful." Flannery O'Connor says
"The type of mind that can understand good fiction is not necessarily the
educated mind, but it is at all times the kind of mind that is willing to have
its sense of mystery deepened by contact with reality and its sense of reality
deepened by contact with mystery."
The
lyric nature of the short story has led some critics, such as Sister Mary
Joselyn, to argue that although all stories have a mimetic base, many have
additional elements that we usually associate with poetry. Some of these poetic
elements she notes are: "(1) marked deviation from chronological sequence,
(2) exploitation of purely verbal resources such as tone and imagery, (3) a
concentration upon increased awareness rather than upon a completed action, and
(4) a high degree of suggestiveness, emotional intensity, achieved with a
minimum of means." Sister Mary Joselyn says that the lyric story often has
a dual action: a syllogistic plot that rests on the onward flow of time, and a
secondary action that expresses "man's attempt to isolate certain
happenings from the flux of time, to hold them static, to probe to their
inwardness and grasp their meaning"
From
its beginnings as a separately recognized literary form, the short story has
always been more closely associated with lyric poetry than with its overgrown
narrative neighbor, the novel. Regardless of whether short fiction has clung to
the legendary tale form of its early ancestry, as practiced by Hawthorne, or
whether it has moved toward the presentation of the single event, as innovated
by Chekhov, the form has always been a "much in little" proposition
that conceals more than it reveals and leaves much unsaid.
3 comments:
Thank you for another excellent and thought-provoking post. What marvellous quotes from Alice Munro, Eudory Welty and Flannery O'Connor!
The more I mull over it, the more I think that questions of time and the passage of time are crucial to the similarities between poems and short stories, and to the ways both these forms differ from the novel. Short stories and poems create, and are free to create, their own occasions, and to link the mundane with an infinite sense of mystery, if the poet or short story writer chooses to do this.
Thank you again for your insights about the short story.
Because of the way you dig into the form and the way you give examples from master writers, I am extending my appreciation of the short story, far beyond my degree program. I gather encouragement in my writing process.
Thanks to Dorothy and Sandra for these kind words about my efforts to understand and appreciate the short story. I much appreciate it.
Post a Comment