In honor of the
great Gabriel Garcia Márquez, who died this week at the age of 87, I post the
following discussion of his last work of fiction, the novella Memoria de mis
putas tristes, (Memories of My Melancholy
Whores),
published in 2004. A novella, rather than a novel, it has many of the characteristics
of those forms from which the short story is descended—the fable, the fairy
tale, and the romance.
Some critics chastised the author and the novella’s hero as
dirty old men who have no social conscience about the exploitation of young
women in third world countries, but it is a misunderstanding of the tradition
of Memories of My Melancholy Whores, as well as Garcia Márquez ’s
obvious intention, to label this a perverted book about an old man’s wicked
lust for a teenage girl. As Garcia Márquez has suggested in previous works,
visiting a brothel does not have the same unsavory aspect in Colombia as it
does in America. Indeed, the author of
the classic One Hundred Years of Solitude (1967) has praised the
brothels of Bogota, where he studied law, even though he was once beaten up
there for failing to pay a prostitute. There is no hint of criminal
exploitation in the book, no sordid reality of young women made chattel to men
with money. Rather the story is about
enrapt attention, fantasy, the romantic dream of pure ideal love.
Although the protagonist
realizes that sex is merely a consolation for not having love, he has never
been able to experience love; indeed has never had sex with a woman unless he
paid for it. That the final object of
his desire is a fourteen-year-old girl has nothing to do with the social issue
of preying on the helpless and innocent.
Neither love nor sex in this novella has anything to do with social
reality; the story is rather a complete romantic idealization of the art-like
object of desire.
The romantic nature of the
old man’s silent observation of the girl as he watches her each night can be
compared to the famous metaphor that opens the quintessential romantic
adoration of an untouched object—John Keats’ “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” For the young girl in Garcia Márquez ’s novella
is a frozen work of art, not to be approached if the true nature of ideal
romantic love is to be sustained. She is
indeed Keats’ “still unravished bride of quietness,” a ‘foster-child of silence
and slow time.” The protagonist knows
that he does not want her to awaken, does not want to hear her voice, does not
want to see her in daylight, but rather wishes only to watch her in silence.
Memories of My Melancholy Whores has been compared to
Vladimir Nabokov’s paean to passion for a child, Lolita (1955), but it
is Dante’s celebration of a similar love for his Beatrice that invented this
kind of romantic love story. Gustave von Aschenbach’s tragic love for the young
Tadzio in Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice (1912) is perhaps the most
famous twentieth century model.
The most immediate comparison is suggested by Garcia
Márquez’s opening epigraph from Yasunari Kawabata’s “House of Sleeping
Beauties” (1926), another classic story of idealistic love of an older man for
a young girl. “House of the Sleeping
Beauties” centers on a brothel visited by old men who can no longer perform
sexually. Forbidden to have sex with the
young women, and thus free of sexual expectations, they lie down with beautiful
young virgins who, under the influence of a sleeping potion, are unaware of
their visits. The central character is a
man who does not tell the madam that he is still able to function as a man, and
his visits are tormented by the fact that he desires more than the girls are
allowed to give. As he lies by different
girls each night, he remembers his youthful adventures and contemplates his own
future impotence as he grows older.
The difference between Kawabata’s story and Garcia Márquez
’novella is that whereas Kawabata is concerned with the inevitability of
growing old and the longing for death, Garcia Márquez holds out for the romantic ideal of never
being too old to fall in love. Memories of My Melancholy Whores is not a
fairy tale for the aged, but rather a fable for the romantic.
The unlikely her says he
is ugly and shy and seems proud to admit that he has never gone to bed with a
woman he did not pay. He was even voted client of the year two different times
in the red-light district he frequents. He says by the time he was fifty, he
had slept with 514 women. Then he simply
stopped counting. He lives in an old ancestral mansion, has no wife, no
children, no kin, no pets. He is cultured, surrounding himself with great
literature, listening to classical music.
Each week he writes in longhand a weekly column for the local Sunday
newspaper, and he is fairly well known in the town. At one time in his youth he was engaged to be
married, but at the last minute he hid from his bride and never again made a
commitment to a woman.
The virgin the madam
arranges for him to visit is a poor girl who works by day sewing buttons in a
clothing factory. She lives with her
crippled mother and provides for her brothers and sisters. She is afraid of sex because a friend once
bled to death when she lost her virginity.
The madam gives her some bromide and valerian that makes her sleep
during the protagonist’s visit. Each
night he lies beside her, listening to her breath, imagining the blood flowing
through her veins. Neither he nor the
reader ever sees her awake. He sometimes
speaks to her in her sleep, but she does not respond. Her only sentence is the
sleep-laden cryptic remark, “It was Isabel who made the snails cry.”
On one other occasion, she
writes an enigmatic sleepwalking message on the mirror when she goes to the bathroom about the tiger not
eating far away. He reads to her from “The Little Prince” and “The Arabian
Nights” and eventually begins to write love letters to her that he publishes as
his columns. It is appropriate that the
protagonist reads fairy tales by Perrault to the young girl, for she is the
classic Sleeping Beauty, untouched and untouchable; to waken her would be to
make her merely human, and that is not what the protagonist falls in love
with. Realists may say that it is
immature to fall in love with a child, with someone you can never have, with
someone you have hardly spoken to; however, most great love stories in western
culture, from Tristan and Iseult to Romeo and Juliet, share such
characteristics.
The old man’s idyll is interrupted by an intrusion from the
real world when an important banker is
stabbed to death in the brothel, and the investigation and bad publicity shuts
it down for months. The protagonist watches for the girl on the street, even
though he knows he would not recognize her dressed and in daylight. He imagines her in what he terms her “unreal”
life, caring for her brothers and sisters, sewing buttons at her work. He feels
he is dying for love, but he also knows that he would not trade his suffering
for anything in the world. During this separation from his beloved, the
protagonist happens to see his long-ago bride-to-be, aged and infirm. He meets
with an old sexual companion who advises him not to die without knowing the
wonder of having sex with someone he loves.
He is anguished by jealousy, thinking that the madam Rosa
Carbacas has sold his loved one to someone else, and he flies into a rage
when it seems that his romantic fantasy love has been contaminated by sordid
reality. But he cannot stay away from
his “Delgadina.” On the morning of his
ninety-first birthday, he and Rosa Cabarcas make what they call an old people’s
bet--that whoever survives keeps everything that belongs to the other one. The madam says instead that when she dies
everything will belong to the young girl, which will amount to the same thing,
for, she tells him in the final improbability of this most romantic novella,
that the poor girl is head over heels in love with him. Radiant, he feels that finally he is
experiencing real life, with his heart condemned to die of happy love. Garcia Márquez thus ends his romantic fable
in the classic fairy tale manner, leaving the reader hopeful that the couple
will live happily ever after.
3 comments:
With all due respect, there are strains of pedophilia throughout Marquez's body of work, and for some reason critics either ignore this or explain it away like you just have. I generally respect your work, but I'm not buying the argument in this post. While Marquez is obviously a great writer, his tendency to sexualize children again and again is a real problem, at least for me.
Ugh. It was probably a confessional then. Jesus. To think I was ready to buy Garcia’s books.
To think broadly, Marquez was a great 'boom' writer indeed.
Post a Comment