I
am sorry to hear that Brian Friel died Friday in Donegal at age 86. The obits in both Los Angeles Times and The New
York Times called him "The Irish Chekhov," but neither obit mentions his short stories.
The
author of thirty-one stories in two collections, The Saucer of Larks
(1962) and The Gold in the Sea (1966), eighteen of which were selected
and republished in The Saucer of Larks:
Stories of Ireland (1969), Friel once made a distinction between the
relationship between the storyteller he began as and the playwright that he
became. Whereas the playwright must
always be concerned with using stealth
to evoke a fresh response from the complacent theater audience, the storyteller
mimics a personal conversation implicitly prefaced with, "Come here till I
whisper in your ear."
However,
there is perhaps more similarity between Friel's stories and his plays than
there are differences. First of all, his
stories are conventionally organized, built on the substructure of a relatively
straightforward thematic idea that can be illustrated by moving relatively
simple characters about on a limited stage.
Although Friel has been compared to Chekhov and Turgenev, whereas there
is a surface similarity, he lacks the character complexity of Chekhov and
Turgenev's lyricism. Here are some thumbnail remarks on some of his best-known
stories:
"Among
the Ruins"
A
typical Friel story, "Among The Ruins" is structured conventionally
around the main character's discovery about the irretrievable nature of the
past. Margo, Joe's wife, arranges, for
the children's sake, for a family day-trip to Donegal where Joe was born and
raised. Although at first he resists the
idea, saying he is not sentimental and that he does not see the point in the
trip, on the way he becomes excited, not because he wants to show his children
where he played as a boy, but because he wants to recapture some lost magic.
However,
when he tries to explain to his wife the significance of the imaginative games
he once played in a secret bower with his sister, he realizes that the past is
an illusion, a mirage that allows an escape from the present. When he finds his son playing his own
imaginative game in the woods, he understands that ironically the past belongs
not to him, but to his son, in a long line of generations, all finding some
meaning in their magic of unrecapturable childhood. Thematically, the story suggests that the
past has meaning not as something that once happened, but as something that
continues to happen, repeating itself over and over again.
"The
Diviner"
The
Irish stereotypes of the alcoholic husband and the shamed and embarrassed wife
form the basis of "The Diviner."
The twist that Friel plays on the story is that Nelly Devenny, the
shamed wife, is freed from her alcoholic husband in the first paragraph of the
story and, after a suitable period of mourning, decides to marry again, this
time to a respectable retired man from the West of Ireland. The story actually begins when, three months
after Nelly marries the man, he is drowned in a lake. After frogmen fail to find the body, a
diviner is brought in, who, like a priest, can smell out the truth. And the truth, which Friel saves until the
end of the story is revealed when the body is brought to the surface and two
whisky bottles are found in his pocket. Nelly's
wailing that ends the story is not so much for the dead husband as it is for
the respectability she had almost gained but which now is lost once again.
"Foundry
House"
"Foundry
House" is Friel's best-known and most widely respected story, primarily
because it features a cast of well-balanced characters in a dramatic scene that
presages Friel's later triumphs in stage drama.
The story is also appealing to many readers because the dramatic
oppositions in the story derive from Irish history and reflect a clearly
defined class distinction that once was known as the "Big House"
system, in which English Protestants lived in the large manor homes with Irish
Catholic peasants dependant on them.
However, because Friel is not really interested in these political or
religious distinctions, he makes both Joe Brennan, the working class descendant
of the peasant class, and the Hogan family, who still live in the big house,
Irish Catholic.
Friel
symbolizes the difference between the dying old way and the competent new
industrial world by making the Hogans aging and sterile and Joe a
radio-television repairman. When Joe is
called to the house to show the family how to play a tape recording from one of
the daughters, a nun in Africa, he is asked to stay and listen, but the father,
now infirm, snaps at him, calling him "boy," as in the old days. However, when Joe returns home and is queried
by his curious wife about the big house, he can only say, as he dresses his
baby for bed, that they are a great, grand family.
"The
Saucer of Larks"
The
magic of the natural world and its momentary superiority over the public world
of rules and protocol dominates "The Saucer of Larks." The protagonist is a police Sergeant in
Donegal who escorts two German officials to disinter the body of a young German
soldier who has crashed in the area during World War II. The landscape has a significant effect on the
Sergeant, making him feel that he would not mind being buried out here, for
with so much life around you, you don't have a chance to be really dead. When they reach the grave site, they hear
hundreds of larks singing, which inspires the Sergeant further in his lyrical
response to nature. Arguing that when
you are buried in one of the big cemeteries in Dublin, you're finished and
complaining about how man destroys such beautiful areas as the place known as
the saucer of larks, he tries to convince the Germans to leave the young pilot
where he is; but the Germans, in stereotyped fashion, can think only of orders
and duty. At the end of the story, when
the Sergeant is back at the station, he wonders what came over him out there,
puzzling that he had never done anything like that ever before, blaming it on
the heat and his age.
"My
Father and the Sergeant"
The
title of this Friel story sufficiently signifies its meaning, for the Father
and the Sergeant are one and the same; the story is told by a young man whose
father, a teacher at the school in Donegal where he attends, is secretly
nicknamed the Sergeant by his students; thus he is both a kind, silent man
troubled by ambition and a stern, hard-driving, humorless task-master. The story is not so much dependent on theme
or complexity of character as it is on a reminiscent tone of gentle sad
memory. When passed over for a better
post, the father decides he will show his superiors what a good teacher he is
by preparing four of his students for the regional scholarship exams. However, when he is stricken by pleurisy and
a substitute must be called in, the young man becomes so popular with his
charges that the father's position is made even more fragile. The story comes to a climax when the new
teacher is accused of kissing one of the young girls, the protagonist's
girlfriend, and is sent packing by the priest.
When the father returns and some of the boys tease the young girl,
saying that she will be wrestling on the couch with the Sergeant next, the
protagonist knocks him down, crying "He's my father." However, rather than tell his father what the
boys have said, the protagonist says only that he hit the boy because he called
him the Sergeant.
Friel
has been criticized by some critics for writing stories that, although they
often are situated on the politically charged boundary between the Republic of
Ireland and Northern Ireland, Friel acts pretty much as if the boundary and the
bloody history that stains it did not exist.
The conflicts that beset his characters are not political but personal;
and the past that Friel evokes is romantic rather than rebellious. Although such slighting of political rhetoric
by Friel in favor of universal longings and romantic illusion may irritate
social critics who want fiction to carry political freight, Friel's short
fiction is firmly within the Irish tradition of universal folk.
I think the NYT did mention the stories, albeit in passing reference to his early publications.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the excellent posts - particularly liked your lists of the most significant stories of past century by decade - have been using that to catch up on many that I'd missed or forgotten.
It is excellent and informative article.The author describe the particular with good language and information.I am very happy to see this type article because i am sure i will get new ideas from this article.Now i am doing my academic writing work with the help of best essay writing service.
ReplyDelete