Cynthia
Ozick is a short-story writer in the tradition of Bernard Malamud, for her
typical story, an almost magical blend of lyricism and realism, creates a world
that is both mythically distant and socially immediate at the same time.
The
magic of the story "The Shawl" is largely due to its point of view
which, although it remains with Rosa the mother and reflects her feelings, also
exhibits the detached poetry of the nameless narrator. For example, Rosa's dried-up breast, from
which the infant Magda cannot suck milk, is described as a "dead volcano,
blind eye, chill hole"; the infant's budding tooth is imaged as "an elfin
tombstone of white marble." The
perspective of this grotesque poetry reflects the extremity of horror of the
Holocaust itself. When we see the knees
of Stella (Rosa's teenage niece) as "tumors of sticks," we see the
Holocaust as though no ordinary imagery is adequate to capture it, no ordinary
voice capable of describing it.
To
try to reflect the horrors of the Jewish persecution under Hitler in terms of
sheer numbers is to create such a numbing effect that it becomes abstractly
unreal. Consequently, Ozick captures the
horror by focusing on a single limited event, an event which is insignificant
in the overall scope of things, but which captures the horror in its
quintessential reality.
It is not the
mere death of the infant that is so horrifying in "The Shawl," for
the story makes it clear that the child was sick and bound to die soon anyway,
as indeed millions did die; nor is it the Jewishness of the infant that makes
it so pathetic, for the story suggests that the child is the result of Rosa's
rape by a Nazi soldier and indeed is like "one of them."
However, as soon as the reader even thinks
such things--that the child was doomed anyway or that the child was Aryan--as a
way to palliate the horror, he or she is caught in the moral madness of the Holocaust
itself, guilty of the same rationale that made the Holocaust possible. Indeed,
this is part of the brilliance of Ozick's story. It is what makes the story morally powerful,
not simply shockingly horrible.
The
shawl, which provides a womb-like protection for the infant, is magic; buried
within it, the child is mistaken for Rosa's breasts. Moreover, when Rosa's milk dries up, the
magical shawl nourishes the infant for three days and three nights; as the
child sucks on its corner, it provides "milk of linen." The shawl also is the central object of the
story's horrifying climax. When Rosa
sees Magda crawling across the central yard of the camp without her comforting
shawl and hears her cry out the first sound she has made since the drying up of
Rosa's milk, the terrified mother is faced with a crucial decision--to run for
the child, even though she knows that her crying will continue without the
shawl, or to run for the shawl and take the risk of the child being found
first.
When
she goes for the shawl, which Stella has taken from the child to wrap around
her own thin bones, the scene that follows is straight out of a nightmare--Rosa
running with the shawl held high like a talisman, the infant being borne away
from the mother over the head of a Nazi guard toward the fence, which hums with
its electrical voices.
As Magda goes
swimming through the air, she looks like a butterfly: "And the moment
Magda's feathered round head and her pencil legs and balloonish belly and
zigzag arms splashed against the fence, the steel voices went mad in their
growling. . . ." Rosa can do
nothing, for whatever she does will mean her own death, so she stuffs the shawl
into her mouth and "drank Magda's shawl until it dried."
"The
Shawl" leaves the reader stunned and breathless with its dumbfounding
horror. Like the infant Magda herself,
the story is practically mute, explaining nothing, simply presenting the event
in its magical and mysterious horror.
Tomorrow:
William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily"
Great reading of this story, particularly where you mention how reader participation breeds a form of complicity. This really strikes at the heart of what makes this story such a powerful study in human nature.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Jeremiah. Readers like you make my work worthwhile.
ReplyDelete