Perhaps the basic problem
for readers of Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" is how to discover the
complexity of this seemingly simple story?
A typical first response may be that it is a relatively straightforward
revenge story. And readers do usually
enjoy sharing the glee with which Montresor "plots" his revenge. However, this may be an opportunity for teachers to make
students more aware of how "plot" is often a function of point of view,
as well as how a narrative that may at first seem like a mere recounting of
events is actually conditioned by complex rhetorical devices.
Although story events
seem merely to move through time, they actually move by means of a calculated
plot, and a plot must be based on motivation--the underlying causes of the
action. To move, a story must have a direction, an end toward which it
progresses. Poe's story, which seems
primarily to be made up of Montresor's "plot" against Fortunato,
physically moves toward the blank wall to which Fortunato will be chained as it
emotionally moves toward the successful fulfillment of Montresor's
revenge.
That this
"end" actually precedes the beginning of the series of events that
seem to make up the story becomes clear when we look at the rhetorical devices
that constitute the plot. (After all,
Montresor has his "plot" in mind before the events begin.) First, there is the fact that the action
begins one evening when, as if by accident, Montresor meets Fortunato at the
carnival. However, nothing is ever
accidental in a story; everything is motivated by Poe's "plot." For example the fact that the two meet at
carnival time, when nothing is as it seems, is meaningfully motivated, as is
the fact that Fortunato's name means "fated" or, ironically,
"fortunate" and that he is dressed, appropriately, as a fool.
Another element of
the story's structure that, even as it seems to be casual, is actually causal,
is the way Montresor maneuvers Fortunato to where he wants him by making him
think he is acting on his own free will.
This theme or motif is established when Montresor tells his servants not
to leave the house, knowing that this will assure their absence. The illusion is that Fortunato
"willingly" goes into the catacombs, not that he is compelled
to. At several points along the way,
Montresor tries to get Fortunato to go back, knowing that by seeming to try to
control him Fortunato will try to act on his own free will and thus be
ironically be controlled.
At several points
along the way, as any good plot-maker must, Montresor gives Fortunato clues as
to the "end" or "point" of the plot. First there is the portent of the coat of
arms with the foot crushing the serpent and the motto that no one harms the
Montresor family with impunity; secondly there is the trowel, which even as it
suggests the secret brotherhood of the Masons, is the tool of Montresor's
ultimate denial of brotherhood which will seal Fortunato's fate.
If we ask what happens
in this story we may say:
"Montresor gets his revenge by killing Fortunato." However, if this were all there was to it,
Montresor might simply have hired some thugs to kill Fortunato; we know that
would not have made the story what it is.
Montresor must get his revenge in a "specifically meaningful"
way. We need to think about why Poe
chose these specific ways? Coleridge
once noted that the pleasure of the art work lay not in the "end" of
the journey, but rather in the pleasures of the journey itself. Readers make the journey with Montresor not
just to get to the end, but to enjoy the journey along the way; and the
pleasures of this journey are the pleasures of the "plot"; that is,
how Montresor "makes things happen."
As other critics have
noted, the story has a thoroughly ironic pattern. If the "you who know so well the nature
of my soul" mentioned in the first paragraph is a priest, then Montresor
may be making a deathbed confession of his crime of fifty years ago. If so, this may mean that Fortunato has
fulfilled Montresor's revenge criteria more effectively than Montresor himself,
for Montresor has not achieved his revenge with impunity; nor did he make
himself known as such to Fortunato when he walled him up, whereas Fortunato,
like the serpent that Montresor has trampled on, still has his fangs embedded
in Montresor's heel.
But, the irony may
cut even more deeply. If Montresor is
making a deathbed confession, there is little indication that he is genuinely
remorseful. On the contrary, Montresor
seems to relive the events with the same glee with which he performed them
fifty years before. Thus, even as he
confesses, he "sins" again.
For what seems such a simple story, "Cask of Amontillado" has
wheels within wheels that just seem to keep spinning.
Tomorrow: Sherwood Anderson's "Hands"
Thank you!..for taking the time to post this. I read the story last night and enjoyed it, however, I am not academic enough to comment beyond whether I enjoyed the/a story or not. For me, it's either, I get it or I don't. I love reading short stories and am mostly confused by them, but, I do respect and follow your comments, analysis and this blog. Thanks again. Kind regards, david
ReplyDeleteThis is the classic short story as written by Poe. It is an interesting short "murder mystery". I would suggest this to anyone, as it takes about five to ten minutes to read and is a short story that everyone should read.
ReplyDelete