Ever since her
first collection of stories, St. Lucy's
Home for Girls Raised by Wolves, came out in 2006, Karen Russell, who was
25 at the time, has been hailed as a "rising star" among the next
generation of "great writers." The
New Yorker named her one of the twenty best writers under the age of forty;
Granta named her one of the Best
American Novelists, and the National
Book Foundation put her in their list of the five best writers under the age of
thirty-five.
Her novel Swamplandia was a finalist
for the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction. (They did not name a winner that
year.) Then, in 2013, she received one of the MacArthur Foundation "Genius
Grants" (which comes with a five-year stipend of $125,000 per year.) Her
most recent book is a novella entitled Sleep
Donation, an e-book published by Atavist Press. (which, just to be fair, I
read this week and found to be typical "what if" generic stuff) She
has said she is now working on a novel.
My
old guy reaction to the stories in Karen Russell's first collection, St.
Lucy’s Home for Girls Raised by Wolves (2006) was that whereas they are fun
to read as childlike fantasies and illuminate some of childhood’s strangeness,
they lack the depth that real exploration of these experiences require. When it comes to magical realism or
philosophically significant fantasies, Karen Russell just needed more
intellectual background, it seemed to me. For profound explorations of the
issues she explores superficially here, I prefer the mature vision of Borges,
Garcia Marquez, John Barth, Donald Barthelme, George Saunders, and Steven
Millhauser. But then, that’s just the
way we old guys are. We prefer fiction
that makes us think, not just makes us smile.
Six years later
in my blog on Russell's Vampires in the Lemon Grove, I said that although I enjoyed
reading Russell’s stories, I sometimes felt they were, if you will forgive me,
a cheap thrill—a Ray Bradbury, T.C. Boyle, Stephen King kind of thrill (apologies to all Bradbury/Boyle/King fans),
whose stories I enjoy reading, but who cleverly stay on the surface. In my opinion, Russell is a fine writer who
knows her away around a sentence, an image, a metaphor with what one reviewer
has called “pixie” charm—apologies to Tinkerbell—but I still failed to see any
depth in her work.
The basic
problem I have with Russell is that she writes simple concept stories—stories
that start with a "what if" idea and stick with it—e.g. the idea of
kicking a habit vis-à-vis vampires and lemon juice; the idea of feminist
liberation, vis-à-vis Japanese girls rebelling against producing silk from
their own bodies. The basic critical
question about the stories of Karen Russell may well be: Is she the protégé of Italo Calvino and
Donald Barthelme, or is she a child of The Twilight Zone and Stephen King?
Her most recent
story "The Bog Girl," which appears in the June 20 issue of The New Yorker, reaffirms my view that
she is the latter--a lightweight, not, as she has been called, a "rising
star among the next generation of great writers"—at least not yet.
Her interview
in The New Yorker's "This Week
in Fiction" website makes the "what if" intention of "The Bog
Girl" quite clear. She says she had
been reading some reports about eight-thousand-year-old human remains being
found in a Florida bog. So she said she started to wonder: "What if one of
these bog bodies could blast us with the fullness of her life? Turn the fire
hose of her interior life onto those seeking to define her from without? I
pictured an ancient young woman rearing off the table, taking on dimension,
shredding our assumptions, challenging our ventriloquy of her mute body."
She said she wrote the story to explore how often we "project our
fantasies onto the mask of another person's face, then feel betrayed when they
turn out to have needs and depths of their own?"
Sounds like
serious stuff. But I have read the story
several times and keep coming up with the usual "what if" Karen
Russell jokes and tricks and gimmicks, and none of the heavy weight stuff she
promises in the "This Week in Fiction" feature.
What if a
fifteen-year-old boy living on a small island in a Northern European
archipelago found the body of a two thousand year old girl while cutting turf
and fell in love with her?
That's the
story. The rest is Karen Russell playing with the idea. The boy, whose name is
Cillian, lives with his mother, whose name is Gillian, and has had no
experience with girls, for he is working to save enough money to buy a car,
which he hopes will make it possible for him to sleep with a girl or woman. The
girl he finds is well preserved and has thick red hair—probably patterned after
the famous Yde Girl, found in 1897 in the Netherlands, and more famously
facially reconstructed in 1992 as a conventionally attractive young woman. (Both
the bog girl and the reconstruction can be viewed in a Dutch museum, and of
course online.) She has a noose running down her back— patterned after the
famous Tollund Man, who was discovered with such a noose in Denmark in
1950. Again, you can also find lots of
pictures of him online.
Since this all
takes place on a remote island, there are no hordes of scientists arriving to
take the body for examination. And to
make it possible for Cillian to cuddle with her, thanks to a Karen Russell
miracle: she does not deteriorate as such bodies, once exposed to the open air,
inevitably do.
As a result,
Cillian and the bog girl can watch sitcoms together on the telly and his uncle
can make jokes about his nephew going after a mature woman, a cougar, as it
were, and advise him that women lie about their age, warning him she might be
three thousand years old rather than just two thousand. (Ha ha). The mother is concerned,
but knowing her son is in love "commanded her respect" and is unwilling
to "turn an orphan from the Iron Age out on the street" (chuckle,
chuckle). Although she allows Cillian to take the girl into his room and close
the door, she says "Everyone has to wear clothes."
More jokes
follow. Cillian goes to visit a travelling exhibit of bog bodies, for it is
only fair that he get to meet her family, takes her to school with him,
propping her up like a broomstick against the lockers. All this is accepted by teachers and school
administrators because they do not want to anger a visitor from the past. When the vice-principle calls Cillian into
his office to give the bog girl a visiting student badge, she slumps over into
his aloe planter (chortle, chortle)
Whatever
real-life implications all this has is suggested by Cillian's accusing his
mother of not wanting him to grow up when she reminds him of her devotion to
him as a child, by girls at the school being envious when Cillian tells them he
has dedicated himself to learning everything about her, and by his mother's warning
him that he should not throw his life away on some Bog Girl (snort, snort).
Of course,
Cillian has to take the Bog Girl to the annual school dance, and when a friend
asks, "Do you guys----, Cillian preempts the questions with: "A
gentleman never tells." (snicker, snicker). Russell justifies all these
jokes by the presumed intellectual observation in her interview: "Howls of
laughter and howls of terror aren't so far removed from one another, I don't
think."
Then, finally,
Russell has to get to her stated intention in the story—to "turn the fire
hose of her interior life onto those seeking to define her from
without." She has to make it the
Bog Girl's story. So , inevitably, she
brings her to life. "The Bog Girl sat up and says Cillian's name.
Ponderously, Russell says: "His mind was too young and too narrow to
withstand the onrush of her life…Some mental earthquake inside the Bog Girl was
casting up a world, green and unknown to him, or to anyone living: her
homeland."
Cillian is
terrified as the Bog Girl reaches out to him, and his mother tells him to take
the girl home and to "let her down gently." When he takes her to the
bog, Russell cannot resist: "This was a bad breakup," and Cillian and
the Bog Girl roll in the mud, with his crying "It's over, it's over."
As she falls back into the Bog, she begins to break apart. But, of course, she haunts his memory, even
as he cries, "Who was that?' or
"What was that?"
It's all pretty
predictable and silly, but Russell seems determined to insist that it is
serious stuff in the "This Week in Fiction" interview, finally taking
a cue from the interviewer that the story is about aging, responding that the
Bog Girl reminds Cillian and Gillian that they are basically children on this
planet, part of an extended family "barnacles on the hull of a ship,
riding through time together."
Russell opines that by the end of the story the Bog Girl's stare has
altered both mother and son and "allowed each to see hidden parts of the
other."
Russell's
conclusion about her story goes this way:
"I would just add that I believe that
people who survive a trauma or have a powerfully disruptive experience (so, all
living people, let's assume) can often feel that a part of themselves is
trapped in amber at that age, even as clock time moves relentlessly
onward. The Bog Girl somehow became a
way for me to think through the haunted experience of growing old in a body
while simultaneously carrying the past forward with you. And certain things—bewilderment and jealously
and fear and pair and love—we humans don't seem to age out of them. I think Cillian gets this by the story's
end."
Oh my, oh my!
We can only nod sagely at such wisdom and thank The New Yorker for once again giving us the stuff of genius.
I don't know
about you, but I prefer Lars and the Real
Girl. In that treatment of the old Pygmalion story, there is something
quite real and moving about an entire town rallying behind the innocent
delusion of a young man's love for an unreal girl. Russell may think she is
exploring serious human reality, but she is really just going for laughs.
1 comment:
Oh, finally.
Sometimes it seems like the media (literary, in this case) need to find the Next Big Thing, and then, if One says it, then all the Others say it too...and we get this overluge of awards and acknowledgments on some author or another (better if young, of course), showing Such Promise...but I read the stories, and I thought 'that's it?'
Best I can say it's: nice stories. But genius? No.
Post a Comment