Today marks the 100th
anniversary of the birth of Carson McCullers.
Although better known as a novelist, McCullers is the author of one of
my favorite stories, “A Tree. A Rock. A Cloud.” I included it in my textbook
collection Fiction’s Many Worlds, and
I assigned it and discussed with my students many times. When the story was selected
by Paul Engles, editor of the O. Henry Award anthology in 1942, Engles said he
considered "A Tree, A Rock, A Cloud" "the most perfect short
story in American Literature."
That’s a very powerful
statement—“the most perfect short story.”
One might well ask what qualities of the story would make Engles make
such a statement. The story is available
online, and I recommend it to you. http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~karchung/A_Tree.pdf
The plot is very
simple: A young paperboy stops at a café one morning while making his route and
is called over by an elderly man drinking alone. The man tells the boy a story
about having won and lost a woman he loved and then developing an explanation
of what that loss meant. Throughout the encounter, the owner of the café makes
scornful comments on the man’s story.
The enclosed
situation of the cafe in the early morning, the confrontation between the young
initiate and the experienced older man; the cynical and ironic observer, the
silent chorus of men in the background--all this suggest a paradigmatic short
story situation. Moreover, the story's
focus on loneliness and the difficulty of loving fits with Frank O'Connor's
famous definition of the short story in The Lonely Voice.
The story echoes
Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”—both because it deals with a man
who has a story to tell and grabs a passerby to insist that he listen, and the
fact that it deals with empathetic identification of one person with another
and therefore with the basic injunction that we love the other as the self. I
have written about this in the first chapter of my book, I Am Your Brother. I agree with Frank O’Connor that it is one of
the archetypal themes of the short story as a genre.
What needs to be
understood about the story is the notion of love that it presents. Some readers may be as cynical as the cafe
owner Leo in their reactions to the notion of loving a tree, a rock, a cloud. What
exactly does that mean? How indeed is
that possible? McCullers provides a suggestion about what she means by love in
her essay, "The Flowering Dream:
Notes on Writing' in The Mortgaged Heart. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin, 1941:
"How, without love and the intuition that comes from love, can a human
being place himself in the situation of another human being? He must imagine, and imagination takes
humility, love, and great courage."
If we ask why it is
easier to love a tree, a rock, a cloud than it is to love a person, the answer
must be that love is indeed synonymous with identification with the other. The aim of love is to dissolve that which
separates us and to swallow up the other.
This is difficult with a person because the other is a subjective
consciousness who wishes to maintain self-identity.
However, as the transient tells the puzzled
boy, one can gradually learn to identify with the other if one begins simply
with the less threatening. This story is about that primitive sense of the
sacred that constitutes true reality, the basic religious yearning of human
consciousness to lose the self in the other.
Leo knows the transient is right, but he also knows that such a demand
is impossible for the ordinary human; the boy, of course, has yet to learn this
hard fact of human reality.
The most important
passages in the story, it seems to me are the following when the man tries to
explain his situation and his science to the young boy:
“It
was like this,” the man continued. “I am a person who feels many things. All my
life one thing after another has impressed me. Moonlight. The leg of a pretty
girl. One thing after another. But the point is that when I had enjoyed
anything there was a peculiar sensation as though it was laying around loose in
me. Nothing seemed to finish itself up or fit in with the other things. Women?
I had my portion of them. The same. Afterwards laying around loose in me. I was
a man who had never loved.”
“Then
I met this woman. I was fifty-one years old and she always said she was thirty.
I met her at a filling station and we were married within three days. And you
know what it was like? I just can’t tell you. All I had ever felt was gathered
together around this woman. Nothing lay around loose in me anymore but was
finished up by her.”
“I
meditated on love and reasoned it out. I realized what is wrong with us. Men
fall in love for the first time. And what do they fall in love with?”
The
boy’s soft mouth was partly open and he did not answer.
“A
woman,” the old man said. “Without science, with nothing to go by, they
undertake the most dangerous and sacred experience in God’s earth. They fall in
love with a woman. Is that correct, Son?”
“Yeah,” the boy said faintly.
“They
start at the wrong end of love. They begin at the climax. Can you wonder it is
so miserable? Do you know how men should love?”
The
old man reached over and grasped the boy by the collar of his leather jacket.
He gave him a gentle little shake and his green eyes gazed down unblinking and
grave.
“Son,
do you know how love should be begun?” The boy sat small and listening and
still. Slowly he shook his head. The old man leaned closer and whispered:
“A
tree. A rock. A cloud.”
“For
six years now I have gone around by myself and built up my science. And now I
am a master. Son. I can love anything. No longer do I have to think about it
even. I see a street full of people and a beautiful light comes in me. I watch
a bird in the sky. Or I meet a traveler on the road. Everything, Son. And
anybody. All stranger and all loved! Do you realize what a science like mine
can mean?”
The
notion of things lying around inside of one until love unifies them into a
complete whole seems to me a crucial description of the short story as a
literary form.
Karen
Allen, who played Indiana Jones’s girlfriend, has obviously been as captured by
“A Tree. A Rock. A Cloud” over the years as I have. She has recently adapted
the story and directed a 30-minute film version of it, which debuts today in
Columbus, Georgia, McCuller’s hometown, to commemorate her 100th
birthday. Here is what Allen said about her admiration of the story in a piece
in the Columbus newspaper:
“It’s
hard to not want to share it with people, and honestly, throughout my life, let’s
say I’ve know this story for 45 years, I have almost never met anybody who had
read it. And I think I just want people to have the experience of her as a
writer, and the beauty and the depth of her writing. I feel like in some almost
mystical way, I am the caretaker of this story, like I’m meant to bring it to
people.”
A
trailer of the film is available online.
It looks like a very fine and faithful adaptation of the story. I wish Ms. Allen luck with her film. I hope
it is available where I can see it some day. Anyone who loves a short story
that much is near and dear to my heart. http://www.atreearockacloudthefilm.com/
I must have read this story over 50 years ago, almost certainly in "Ballad of a Sad Cafe", and I still remember it, remember its premise, although it is time to reread it I think.
ReplyDelete"The notion of things lying around inside of one until love unifies them into a complete whole seems to me a crucial description of the short story as a literary form." Not sure if that could be applied to the entire short story form as form, unless you mean it in the sense that Poe used it where everything in the short story must be subordinated to the total unity of effect.
Yes, that's how I mean it, although I do push the concept a bit further than Poe did.
ReplyDeleteThat's seems interesting to me.
ReplyDelete