I wrote about this story when it first appeared in the New Yorker.
Here are some of my remarks:
In McFarlane's story, the central characters are a school teacher named
Miss Lewis, a student favorite named Joseph, and the twenty-one other students
in her class. On the day of the story, the kids want to play
"buttony." They form a circle,
hold out their hands, and close their eyes, while Joseph, who has been sent in
to get a button from Miss Lewis's desk drawer, walks around the circle and
touches each pair of hands, saying at the same time "buttony." After he goes to all twenty-one students,
they are told to close their hands and open their eyes; each student is given
the chance to guess who's got the button. The one who has been holding the
button—not the one who guesses correctly-- gets to "hide" it the next
time.
On this particular day that the children play the game, something
different happens—as it must, or else there would be no story: When Joseph gets
the button on a subsequent round of the game, he walks around the circle but
does not hide the button in anyone's hand, but rather puts it in his
mouth. Only Miss Lewis has her eyes open
to see this action. When the children guess everyone and still cannot find the
button, they begin to kick and shout and rebel against Miss Lewis—opening her
hands, looking up her skirt, and pulling the pins from her hair to look for the
button.
In her interview with Deborah Treisman, McFarlane says as the wrote the
story she was interested in the "strange ritualistic way in which the game
plays out so many childhood fears—of rejection, of being overlooked or lied to
or tricked."
And indeed, if you put yourself in the game, you can imagine its
potential for significance. The twenty-one kids have their eyes closed and thus
live in darkness during the game's duration.
They hold out their hands in supplication, waiting for an undeserved
gift, something to be presented to them by a powerful giver, waiting to be
chosen—feeling the disappointment of the giver touching their hands but putting
nothing in it, and then the joy of feeling the button in the palm.
And when it is time to guess who has the button, all you really know is
that you do not have it. As in a
combination of poker-face and counting cards, the players watch the faces of
the rest of the players to see if they give themselves away and try to keep
track of all those who have played their hand by saying they do not have the
button.
Farlane's point is that the game, as it is played in her story, is not
merely a child's game, but something more powerfully latent with meaning.
The key line, one that McFarlane cannot resist using, is: "They
were like children in a fairy tale, under a spell." And yes, the story has
all the elements of a fairy tale—a hero with special powers, an adult who is
somehow mysteriously guilt and must be punished, a ritual or ceremony, a magic
object, children spellbound, a secret, a trick, a childhood rebellion against
the adult, and a last-minute rescue.
"Buttony" creates the kind of seemingly trivial, yet
ultimately magical encounter with alternate reality that the short story has
always done so well. And as usual, it has something to do with the tension
between the sacred and the profane—between the spiritual and the trivial—between
innocence and experience.
McFarlane handles these traditional short story elements quite well in choice
of detail and in storytelling syntax. For example, "All the children
handled the button with reverence, but none more than Joseph. He was gifted in
solemnity. He had a processional walk and moved his head slowly when his name
was called—and it was regularly called."
We know that something must be at stake for one character, and we know
it is Miss Lewis, for the story is told from her perspective, and it is she who
is "responsible." McFarlane tells us:
"Miss Lewis wanted her children to live in a heightened way, and
she encouraged this sort of ceremony."
So it is really no surprise that Miss Lewis is the one who is attacked
at the end of the story, for even though the button is secretly hidden in
Joseph's mouth, it is she, the children suspect, who has the button. Children
always know there is a secret, and who else must have it except the adult, the
teacher?
When one child looks up under her dress, as if there is where the
secret must lie, and another tears through her hair, as though it must somehow
be in her head, Miss Lewis cries out and sees one of the other teachers running
toward her with Joseph behind him, "not quite running, not altogether, but
like a shadow, long and blank and beautiful." For Joseph is not so much
real as he is a supernatural or spiritual embodiment of forces that we suspect
lie around us, but that we can never really verify. We don't know what they are, but we know they
mean something.
At the end of her interview with Deborah Treisman, McFarlane says:
"Most of all, I'm drawn to those moments when people do things that are
mysterious even to themselves."
McFarlane could not come up with a better characterization of the short
story form than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment