Michelle Huneven’s “Too Good to Be True,”
Several stories in this year’s O.
Henry Prize Stories raise for me the issue of the difference between the
pleasure we get from reading novels vs. the pleasure we get from reading short
stories—an issue which may be related to the question of plot vs. form or
reality vs. artifice.
The author of four novels, Michelle Huneven calls herself a “novelist
by nature” a designation she does not define, although she says she had to
“prune” some “virulent digressions” from “Too Good to Be True” resulting from
her “novelistic nature.” Laura Furman, the editor of the O. Henry collections, who chooses all the stories included each
year, says Huneven’s story exhibits the writer’s skill to permit the “reader to
ride on the narrative current without noticing form or technique”-- a novelistic
characteristic that is often more focused on reflecting the so-called “real
world,” rather than creating a formal world of thematic significance.
David Bradley, the author of two novels, chose “Too Good to Be True” as
his favorite story in this year’s O.
Henry Prize Stories, admitting that
he has always loved the “long, not the short” of a story and that as a teacher
of creative writing, he struggled to conceal this prejudice from this students.
He says that while he teaches Poe’s insistence that no word should be written
that does not contribute to the story’s one pre-established design, he has
always found undue length less exceptionable than undue brevity. Bradley says he has never thought a tale “more
elegant just because I could read it between or during bathroom breaks.” He
says that what he wants while sitting by a roaring fire with a glass of bourbon
and a book was an “old-fashioned story, a la Chaucer, Rabelais, or Balzac, with
a beginning, middle, and ending.” Huneven’s story was his favorite because it kept him sitting longer than he wanted and
haunted him even after his glass was
empty and the fire was out. That all sounds very “novelistic by nature” to me.
So I asked myself, one again as I have for lo these many years: What is
“novelistic” and what is “short storyistic” by nature—willing to accept all the
while that a novel can have short story characteristics and a short story can
have novelistic characteristics. If I ask myself what “Too Good to Be True” is about, I would say it is about a young woman who is a drug addict and her family’s pain at their inability to help her escape that habit. The story is novelistic rather than short storyistic because it does not “mean” anything; it is rather "about" "as if" real characters in the real world.
Here are some other stories that I would
characteristic as “novelistic” rather than “short storyistic” in the 2017 O. Henry Prize Stories:
Genevieve Plunkett, “Something for a Young Woman”
There is something of a mystery in this story of a young woman who
works for a shop owner who gives her a necklace. She marries someone else,
wants to play the viola in a symphony, has a baby, separates from her husband,
is drawn back to the shop owner, but makes no contact with him, wears the
necklace to his funeral, and cannot make up her mind about returning to her
husband. This could go on and on, much
as a novel can go on and on—never coming to a thematically meaningful ending.
Mary LaChapelle, “Floating Garden”
A young boy and his mother escape from an unnamed country in
conflict. He becomes separated from his
mother, but continuing on his own, boards a ship and ends up in Oakland. He is
taken in by a woman who raises him and goes to a Southern California college on
a scholarship. This is a straightforward journey story, told in first person,
and could have been a novel had the details of his escape and his new life in America been more elaborated
detailed. But it has no thematic meaning
other than the “as if” real events in the boy’s escape.
Keith Eisner, “Blue Dot”
Although this story begins in fairy tale fashion with “Once upon a
time,” it is actually a realistic story about young people hanging out and
taking drugs. They talk a lot, but not about anything of thematic significance.
Lesley Nneka Arimah, “Glory”
This story is from Arimah’s What
It Means When a Man Falls From the Sky, a debut collection that received
good reviews and stirred up some publicity. It is a story about a young Nigerian
woman whose parents named her “Glorybetogod.” But she seems to have come into
the world resenting it. When she meets a young man, who seems to have been born
lucky, her parents think Glory’s fortunes have changed--that her life will
“coalesce into an intricate puzzle.” However, when the young man offers her a
ring, she knows she must make a decision. She could go on and on having
encounters like this, chapter after chapter.
Manuel Munoz, “The Reason is Because”
Munoz says in the comments at the end of the O. Henry Awards that the character in his story named Nela, who
gets pregnant and drops out of school, reminds him of girls he grew up with. He
says he does not see characters like Nela in American fiction often and that
the story was a way for him to deal with what has been a long standing problem
in his fiction—“how to name the violence that shapes the people I write
about—the people I love—without veering into stereotype.”
No comments:
Post a Comment